In 1970 the National Gallery of Art renamed this portrait “John Bill Ricketts,” disregarding the definitive 1879 identification of the sitter as Jean B. Breschard by George C. Mason (author of The Life and Works of Gilbert Stuart), George Washington Riggs (known as “The President’s Banker” and a founder of the Corcoran Museum of Art) and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Mason’s book and the Boston Museum’s exhibition weren’t sufficient evidence for the NGA. Living witnesses to Breschard’s performances weren’t enough. Instead they turned to a small note by T. Allston Brown, a gentleman with a reputation for inaccuracy, and changed the name of Stuart’s painting from "Breschard, the Circus Rider" to "John Bill Ricketts."
The entire NGA identification rests upon unsupported statements by T. Allston Brown as to who owned the portrait previous to George Washington Riggs. According to Brown the last owner before Mr. Riggs was a certain Peter Grain, a Frenchman and artist. This is the NGA provenance and primary reason for changing the identification. http://www.nga.gov/fcgi-bin/tinfo_f?object=3160&detail=prov
Oddly enough Peter Grain’s son, Peter Grain, Junior, spent most of his professional career working as a scenic director at the Walnut Street Theatre in Philadelphia which was built by Pépin and Breschard. If someone could show that Peter Grain, the elder, was a member of the Circus of Pépin and Breschard, it certainly would go a long way to discrediting the NGA provenance based on the words of T. Allston Brown (This was a man who could publish six factual mistakes within a single paragraph. See my January 8, 2010 blog post. ).
By request of Beth Ahrens-Kley who publishes a Gilbert Stuart blog and is currently researching this particular debate, what follows is fairly definitive proof that Peter Grain was a member of the Circus of Pépin and Breschard. Peter Grain would certainly be capable of identifying his old boss, Jean Baptiste Breschard and passing this information along to George Washington Riggs. This should put an end to any justification for the current NGA stand that the portrait is of Ricketts. Any reasonable institution should once again identify the portrait as Breschard, the Circus Rider.
An 1809 advertisement for the Circus of Pépin and Breschard in New York
“This Evening, Aug. 2, 1809, Messrs. Pepin, & Breschard, will have the honor to give a brilliant representation of Horsemanship, Vaulting and Dancing.To which will be added for the first time the New Pantomime of BILLY, or the Reward of a Good Action, performed with combats, &c. by Mr. P. Grain”
and now from the Walnut Street Theatre
follow this link: Stuart portrait identified as Breschard
This is only the beginning. It's time to bring back this forgotten piece of history.
-
-
The illustration above is not a portrait of Jean Breschard, but the portrait of John Bill Ricketts by Gilbert Stuart, identified as such by Stuart himself. It is in the collection of the National Gallery in Washington.
ReplyDeleteRicketts established the first circus in America, in Philadelphia, in 1793, long before Breschard became active in the circus field. See the following link: http://www.circopedia.org/index.php/John_Bill_Ricketts
The painting is dated between 1795 and 1799, while Brenschard traces are not appearing in America before 1806.
ReplyDeleteThe man is Ricketts, as the painter itself declares in the bottom left corner of the picture.
Furthermore, there are proof of Stuart and Ricketts in Philadelphia and of the problems in completing the picture: portrait was not completed as “...the artist, becoming angry at the equestrian, who gave him a good deal of trouble by his want of promptitude and the delays which occurred, is said to have dashed his paintbrush into the face of the portrait, declaring that he would have nothing more to do with him.” J. Thomas Scharf and T. Westcott, History of Philadelphia, 1609-1884 (Philadelphia: L.H.Everts and Co. 1884), Vol II, p 1044.
Sorry for you.
Raffaele De Ritis
The National Gallery of Art shows no reference date for the painting. Any date is at best speculation on their part.
ReplyDeleteThe writing on the bottom corners does not read either Ricketts or Breschard, the NGA confirms this.
The anecdote you reference was written many years after the portrait was created, there is nothing saying that this is the painting being referenced, and according to Wescott, that painting was ruined.
There is nothing you state which specifies Ricketts as being the sitter.
Regarding the writing on the corners of the painting, follow this link:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nga.gov/fcgi-bin/tinfo_f?object=3160&detail=ins
As you can see, the name is not Ricketts.
Stuart never identified this painting himself. Nobody's claimed that before.
ReplyDeleteRicketts circus in the US was less than eight years before Pepin and Breschard, hardly long before.
Before repeating inaccuracies from the NGA, I suggest both of you do some original research.